PDF file
published
in Haaretz on March 26, 2008.
Israel's Academic About-face
by Dan Ben-David Despite the annual oscillations in
rainfall, we know how much water can be expected to fall over a multi-year
period – just as we know how to calculate the population’s annual growth rate
and its rate of consumption. All of this
has been known for many years, but we are nonetheless about to dive head first
into an empty pool next year. About 15
years ago, the number of vehicles in Israel was roughly half the Western
average – but the traffic congestion on Israel’s roads was already three times
the Western average. It was not to
difficult to guess then what would happen to future traffic congestion when
living standards here would begin to rise to Western levels and we would buy
more cars. Just like with the water resources, the
same neglect occurred in transportation and in many other areas. Time and again, we disregard issues whose
default outcomes are painfully clear – only to wake up in overtime, with
enormous damage having already been inflicted, and a resultant “no other
choice” solution that is often bad, partial, very expensive and wasteful. Similarly, the approaching storm in
higher education is already visible on the horizon. In contrast with the water and transportation
problems, this is one problem that will not extend into overtime. When this buzzer goes off, the game will end. Until the seventies, Israel managed to
bring the number of academic research and teaching staff per capita up to
American levels. But the sharp about-face
that then occurred in Israel did not happen in the States. While the number of research and teaching
positions per capita fell by 35 percent in Israel, it rose by 29 percent in
America. Even if Israel’s non-research
colleges are included, there are 40 percent more academic positions per capita
today in the States – and this, despite the fact that the number of academic
degrees per capita granted in Israel is 13 percent higher than in the U.S. How did we reach our current state? The ratio of public university budgets to GDP
in Israel in 1979 was identical to the American ratio during the subsequent
year, 1980. Between then and 2000 (the
final year for which American data is available), this ratio rose by 23 percent
in the States and it fell by 15 percent in Israel. All told, the ratio of university budgets to
GDP in Israel today is 38 percent below what it was in 1977. After correcting for differences in
living standards across countries, Israel’s public expenditure per student in
higher education was 26 percent below the OECD average in 2004. In fact, this measure – which reflects
changes in public expenditure per student relative to changes in GDP per capita
– is low not only in comparison with other countries, it is 32 percent lower
today than what we spent in 1977. During 30 years of budgetary neglect
and an archaic institutional organization, we did not have the common sense to
retain or bring back to Israel’s research universities a large bulk of an
entire generation’s top scientists and researchers. While these were abandoned, the generation
that made the country’s universities what they are got progressively older. According to data from Israel’s Council for
Higher Education, the proportion of senior academic staff aged 55 and up in the
States is roughly one-third, in Australia it is about one-quarter and in
England it is just one-sixth. In Israel,
nearly one-half of the entire senior academic staff is aged 55 and up. The implication: within just one decade, one
half of the current senior academics – those who brought Israel to the
frontiers of human knowledge and endowed the country with a qualitative
advantage in the markets and defense – will be going home. Who will replace them? There is no lack of individuals with
PhDs knocking on the universities’ doors, but it is difficult to create, within
just ten years, a cohort of excellence at the level that will soon be retiring. The more time elapses, the farther we will
need to lower the acceptance bar – with all that this entails regarding a
dangerous slide into a mediocrity trap that will be difficult, if not
impossible, to extricate ourselves from. Like in other strategically important
realms, the writing that is on the wall could not be any clearer. Is anyone looking? comments
to:
danib@post.tau.ac.il
|